By Asa Veek (Deacon and Church Treasurer)
I was originally excited to read Ordinary: How to Turn the World Upside Down. The description, with statements like, "Ordinary is not a call to be more radical. If anything, it is a call to the contrary. The kingdom of God isn’t coming with light shows, and shock and awe, but with lowly acts of service" caught my interest. When I read it, I was encouraged, inspired, angered, frustrated and disappointed.
I was originally excited to read Ordinary: How to Turn the World Upside Down. The description, with statements like, "Ordinary is not a call to be more radical. If anything, it is a call to the contrary. The kingdom of God isn’t coming with light shows, and shock and awe, but with lowly acts of service" caught my interest. When I read it, I was encouraged, inspired, angered, frustrated and disappointed.
Merida
makes the argument, quite convincingly, that acts of service aren't optional
for the believer. As a response to, and work of, the Gospel, we believers
should be engaged in a lifestyle of caring for the disenfranchised and those
without a voice. We should be serving those who cannot repay, not for the
praise, but out of a grateful response to a God who has redeemed us.
While
I feel Merida makes his point, I was left with two nagging feelings.
First, the book felt like a bit of an overreaction to the highly theological
and theoretical parts of his own life (and the lack of practical
demonstration). Second, while trying to make the case for the breadth of
opportunities to serve the poor, needy, orphaned and widowed, the book quickly
became an argument to rally behind the cause of human trafficking - a worthy cause
- but currently the "cause-du-jour," both within the church and in
the secular culture.
Comments
Post a Comment